InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

phrantic

06/03/10 9:11 AM

#9830 RE: waterdog451 #9829

Excellent point WD! That is very likely.
icon url

goforthebet

06/03/10 9:13 AM

#9831 RE: waterdog451 #9829

High Level of Bacteria Found in Bottled Water in Canada
ScienceDaily (May 26, 2010) —

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100525140954.htm

A Montreal study finds heterotrophic bacteria counts, in more than 70 percent of bottled water samples, exceed the recommended limits specified by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Researchers from Ccrest laboratories report their results May 25 at the 110th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology in San Diego.

"Despite having the cleanest tap water a large number of urban Canadians are switching over to bottled water for their daily hydration requirements. Unsurprisingly, the consumer assumes that since bottled water carries a price tag, it is purer and safer than most tap water," says Sonish Azam, a researcher on the study.

Regulatory bodies such as Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health Canada have not set a limit for the heterotrophic bacteria counts in bottled drinking water. However, according to the USP not more than 500 colony forming units (cfu) per milliliter should be present in drinking water.

The study was initiated in response to a Ccrest employee's complaint of fowl taste and sickness after consumption of bottled water at the company. Azam and her colleagues Ali Khamessan and Massimo Marino randomly purchased several brands of bottled water from a local marketplace and subjected them to microbiological analysis. They discovered more than 70 percent of famous brands tested did not meet the USP specifications for drinking water.

"Heterotrophic bacteria counts in some of the bottles were found to be in revolting figures of one hundred times more than the permitted limit," says Azam. In comparison the average microbial count for different tap water samples was 170 cfu/mL.

Azam stresses that these bacteria most likely do not cause disease and they have not confirmed the presence of disease-causing bacteria, but the high levels of bacteria in bottled water could pose a risk for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, infants, immunocompromised patients and the elderly.

"Bottled water is not expected to be free from microorganisms but the cfu observed in this study is surprisingly very high. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to establish a limit for the heterotrophic bacteria count as well as to identify the nature of microorganisms present in the bottled water," says Azam.
icon url

goforthebet

06/03/10 9:21 AM

#9834 RE: waterdog451 #9829

and probably even the government would push that...
icon url

semper fi 1

06/03/10 12:13 PM

#9843 RE: waterdog451 #9829

Good point WD. The all powerful insurance industry basicly writes the rule/code book that I must carefully follow in my profession.
Thanks to Go`s research I now understand how this Listeria bug etc. can bring a food company to it`s knees. I believe that through out history many people,not all, were slow to embrace new inventions like the automobile,electricity, telephone etc. When sales slowly started with these now common items the sceptics began to realize that the technology was in fact not Voodoo magic! I agree with TEB in that once a couple companies employ AsepticSure a possible flood of demand will result. Now more than ever the huge potential and need for AsepticSure blows my mind!