Replies to post #163574 on Conversion Solutions Holdings (fka CSHD)

[mretgnol]

Which definitely shows that Rufus wasn't completely ignoring the SEC as some here say

TeamPlayer, if I was facing serious jail time for financial fraud, my butt would be in court....with copies of all SWIFT transfers, I would subpoena and force my bank compliance officer to testify on my behalf, showing proof I was not lying.

Roofus has none of that...because he lied.

Doofus cannot show proof those instruments were formally blocked on behalf of the company's benefit, was caught in a major lie trying to claim ownership of what turned out to be a European Medium Term Note (a multiple tranched bond), and the Venezuelian bond was never controlled by Ismaet Paez.

INBOCA, the owner of that Venezuelan bond, never once tried to consumate a deal with Rufus or Conversion Solutions.

bonds, mtns, T-strips, treasury checks, does not matter. Claiming ownership of a leased banking security for the purpose of conducting a business transaction is a criminal offense in the United States. Period.

[mastaflash]

"wasn't the share holders that's for sure!! " - On that we can agree.

[Deano361]

I recall that from somewhere. Probably posted on the old board of a reply Rufus sent to Ms. Black.

[sc4good]

The SEC probably had more important things on their minds. Maybe a little porn thrown in for recreation.