Replies to post #4783 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[tainaor]

"True this will work but it is so so slow due to very large overhead for each of the packet and if you are talking about VPN"

This is BS, you haven`t tested this. Check out the company Orsus. BT have a fin collabaration with several companies which solves these problems. I can`t believe you actually think a company that uses 100 000$ pr quarter has a bright future. I`ts laughable i would say. This i know because, i have been running a software business and i won`t get anywhere with that kind of money. BT uses ten times what CLYW uses pr quarter and they are of course expanding beacuse you need to do that if you`re gonna have success in a large scale. That`s why they bought another company with a connection manager solution and are now spending 2 million $ and in addtion to this they are working with Cisco, Symbian, HP, Motorola, Nortel, Alcatel, Capgemini, Ericsson and severeal others. They have 34 mobile operators as customers (Vodafone, 3, Telenor, Orange and so on. You actually think CLYW can compete alone with this, with 100 000$ pr quarter?

[nlightn]

bbaazz - you missed the point,...i highlighted what was the important point. that being that the large network companys will not bow to CLYW's patent. it holds no real value. in fact and in the real world it is merely a concept that to date has not shown actual workablity. and if they do ever get it up and operating there is no assurance that it has legal bite to it. and if CLYW wants to pursue what they consider infringement they will have to ring the lawsuit to prove their case. that takes filing fees, attorney fees, etc. and all that from a company that has a burn rate of $100K monthly and no revenue.

additionally the usage of PAS (personal access system)in china and the broader asian markets solve the problems with seamless roaming and switching.

so we've got two protocols, Birdsteps and PAS, that don't even touch or infringe on CLYW's susposed revolutionary technology. what CLYW has is no longer revolutionary,...if anything it is old news technology. and that is sad because they could have captured a market had they really performed that bench test on a real phone and had real results that they could immediately brought to market.

CLYW's patent a winner,...i'm just not getting that picture.