I won't argue with you that yesterday's PR didn't do much good, but I'm saying what I am willing to do, and YES...If I can't get .0001s when I have funds available, I will pay .0002 not only b/c I consider it cheap, but also because I will HELP get through the .0002 wall.
GL!
V
Posted by: WhatDoesItAllMean Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:24:50 AM
In reply to: Vianna who wrote msg# 121831 Post # of 121847
Yesterday's announcement did much harm and absolutely no good. A shareholder shouldn't have to "help the cause"!!! The company should stand on its own merits without shareholder help. No individual shareholder unless they are putting in millions of dollars will have an impact on the share price; a consummated deal will. Yesterday's announcement rocked me and you should take an objective look too. This is not to say the deal won't happen, but it raises tremendous questions why the company would put out a PR directed at gamblers. Would any major company do such a thing? ...NO! What stage is the audit? What are the deal roadblocks? How are they being resolved? What company will disburse the funds? What is the target date? Why would this target date be more accurate than the failed dates in the past? Etc. Telling people to buy at $0.0002 is similar to the PR saying essentially "you will get rich if you hang in there a bit longer."
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
