InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

notagain1

05/18/10 11:00 AM

#789 RE: RCFlyerDan #788

No,

And it didnt say that green energy is persuing any funding thats apperantly available from the government to aid in getting this new technolgy they have off the ground.

Lots of, this industry this and this industry that. I wanna hear meat and potatoes from the company that we have a machine ready to perform this duty,or its almost complete, and market it.

Im sure the flood gates would open if green energy had this tool ready for deployment,the government would eat it up, the farming industry would be forced to implement it, and the company sells and maintains the product.
Sounds difficult? The Government is ready to push this to the limits and the tree huggers would make them.

IMHO
icon url

csh2020

05/18/10 12:29 PM

#790 RE: RCFlyerDan #788

Not any substance to the PR - just about the industry rather than anything about GELV! However, the PR was a response to gov't statements/policies about biomass-to-energy conversion, which is completely unrelated to the Peck deal - I would not have expected the PR to mention Peck. But would have liked more of what they are doing to tap into the gov't resources! Too much talk, not enough action, IMO.