InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

tbone58x

01/06/05 6:42 AM

#981 RE: lentinman #977

Len, what about PYTM.ob with a P/E of 1.34?
icon url

cannonball2010

01/06/05 7:50 AM

#983 RE: lentinman #977

Lentiman,concerning PE,
Hweb said to take a look at the last quarter numbers of a stock and to multiply by 4.
EZEN reported earnings of 0.0292$ per share in the last quarter.So the EZEN pe is not 5.83 but 9.So with a pe of 10
EZEN would trade at...1.15.

Now regarding PDGE it reported 0.09$ per share in the last quarter that's 0.36 for the year.So forward PE is not near 9 (like EZEN)but 3.9.Apply a pe of 10 and you'll
have a price of 3.60$.

you must not see the past(last 4 quarters) but the future(what it could be done).
icon url

Guy

01/06/05 8:36 AM

#987 RE: lentinman #977

Len, some of the stocks on this list has low PE's
because of one time gains.
Also, EGAM for example lost money in their last Q
on declining revenues after several profitable Q's.

Re: OWENQ and >>So for all intents and purposes,
anyone who bought at the time of your initial post is down.<<

I don't know what are your intents and purposes...LOL,
but since it was/is a SHORT play, it is a good thing that it
is down from the time of that post.

Guy

icon url

abh3vt

01/06/05 10:08 AM

#994 RE: lentinman #977

Len, be careful of one time gains or untaxed earnings that can make a low PE stock seem cheaper than it really is. Have you performed that analysis on these stocks? I think its unfair to use PE comparisons when one stock is fully taxed vs another company that isn't because of temporary tax shields.

Thanks for the list....I see some that I own as well:

AOBO
PDGE
KPCG
IPII
ACRG