I'll respond because this is fun, and your tone is condescending. Your first sentence is only an accusation ("showing a false angle"). Why is it false? By what standards? How is it less valid than the angle found on a different chart?
Your second sentence is only a definition, followed by a baseless assertion. You don't explain how the distortions are misleading.
Really, if you feel this passionate against a type of chart, I'd expect to see some actual defense. No disrespect intended from me.
RSInvestor
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
