Talk about rank speculation. Where in the world are you getting that the FDA doesn't understand what the DViS does? They get that it is an X-Ray and CT device that offers 3D images in real time. They had some question as to whether it could generate comparable images to both an XRay and a CT device in its various modalities. That's why they asked for the Radiologist Review, and the Radiologist Review no doubt addressed that question. The fact is, as stated by Dean on the last Conference Call, the FDA has never even uttered the word PMA and he believes there is no chance we head down that path. It's not been discussed and the types of questions that have been asked, confirm for him, that it is not a possibility. I will trust Dean's opinion, who is having frequent interaction with the FDA, over this speculation of yours any day.