InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Hawk700

04/27/10 10:24 PM

#211471 RE: amj23 #211469

Gas and Oil....it all sounds good to me!!!!!
icon url

2IRAs

04/27/10 10:24 PM

#211472 RE: amj23 #211469

Thank you very much for that positive info. I appreciate it.
icon url

retep0517

04/27/10 10:26 PM

#211473 RE: amj23 #211469

Your "guy" is very talkative....nice guy.
icon url

dat_51or

04/28/10 1:05 PM

#211767 RE: amj23 #211469

AMj...thanks for your post.
Like most of the investors here, I'm trying to sort out the info released at the SH meeting yesterday and appreciate reports like yours on conversations, etc.

What has me most puzzled right now are seemingly conflicting reports on the nature of the gas found. Some say it is wet gas/condensate, like your source. Others say it it biogenic or dry gas. The trascript I believe specifically mentioined biogenic gas.

My web search (I'm not an oil industry person) seems to indicate that that biogenic gas isn't associated with condensate gas and is less likely be associated with oil deposits(not good). That said, bigenic gas doesn't appear to be an across the board indicator, either.

Anyway, are you able to go to your contact that attended and get more info on Grala's comments on condensate gas vs biogenic?

I value your opinions and thank you in advance for what you can pass on.

Best,
dat
icon url

retep0517

04/28/10 3:42 PM

#211852 RE: amj23 #211469

The tone and message was much different in our private conversations with officers and directors than at the formal presentation. The message, at least to this attendee, was don't worry, be happy...seriously.
icon url

chrislongshot

04/28/10 5:19 PM

#211908 RE: amj23 #211469

amj23 Please I'm not picking for a fight I'm here because I beleive in this investement But the Total certain thing??? Was your guy at the same meeting I was, because I also heard what Dan Gralla said during the meeting. He actually made a joke about knowing anything about Total he had been questioned quite a bit about it then made some comment about shareholders of cvx or total knowing anything about it, It was a joke, sarcasym other board members even talked about it I beleive Peter, point being they put it out loud and clear they did not know what Total and cvx were or were not doing no more than we in the audience knew so for anyone to post anything different is?? lets say an honest mistake, someone might actually beleive it
icon url

chrislongshot

04/28/10 5:35 PM

#211920 RE: amj23 #211469

Yankee mike please I was at the board meeting please if you are gonna highlight a post about the board meeting it would be nice to at least highlight ones where the person was actually there and hopefully posted accurate information, that crap about total being certain please reconsider that one it's not accurate. They covered it during the Q & A Dan was actually making a joke are being sarcastic about it , he made a crack about would total or cvx if they were in a deal would their shareholders know and then someone in the audience said something about how many shares that shareholder held help me out with this someone that was there