InvestorsHub Logo

SAMNOTSAMUEL

12/28/04 2:01 PM

#6381 RE: pual #6380

Probably most did not accept the 6 million number as 100% fact, but with the high volume of shares trading per day there was plenty of room to be in favor that the figure had merit.

Unfortunately a point against the company is we have every reason to believe they wanted to keep the share count quiet as long as possible including much deception. This is directly in contrast to their stated desire I feel to become a fully reporting company.

I will up 60% to 70% chance going below $1.

sam

Rawnoc

12/28/04 6:19 PM

#6402 RE: pual #6380

More hogwash by pual.

>> These supported possibility number 3 ("3- He found something no one else could. I even offered hypothesis which could have explain his quoted 6,000,000 number, assuming it was right.") >>


Noone else could?

You had 48 hours straight to pick up the simple phone and make a simple phone call. You didn't.

Yet you continued to beat the drum that I was lying during that 48 hours. How convenient that I "knew" nobody would pick up the phone when I was begging YOU and others to.

>> Hopefully, putting in doubt whatever is read an an anonymous message board and not verified, is not only a characteristic of mine. >>

Yeah, you put it to doubt so much that you didn't even pick up the phone. In addition, if you put even a meager amount of effort into, you could have easily verified the figure as well.

A figure which there was no reason to lie, a figure that you yourself kept insisting you believed to be wrong (how foolishly stubborn), a figure which there was no logical reason whatsoever to back up any assumption of lying given the steps handed to you on a silver platter to verify it yourself.

Continue your denial.