InvestorsHub Logo

chichi2

04/23/10 1:35 PM

#43496 RE: chichi2 #43457

See SAR breakout on Daily_SPX, & Doji(Indecision) on Daily_QQQQ

VIX SPY QQQQ daily/wkly/month (by Myself °¿°,+Chi2)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=49167034

chichi2

05/06/10 4:36 PM

#43602 RE: chichi2 #43457

Note in Particular $SPX fibonacci Monthly chart

click on repled to msg
$VIX, $SPX, QQQQ

chichi2

05/08/10 2:33 PM

#43627 RE: chichi2 #43457

ck $VIX,$SPX,QQQQ charts (Many changes)

see replied to Msg

Notes:
Changes in Weekly or Monthly are potential alerts regarding longer term trends, be careful which ever side you are on.

"End of Week" are of some importance higher than single days.

A "61.8% correction" (or achievement) of a Run is usually considered at a "go" or "no go" point. If 61.8% is Broken on Close, it is out-of-character to have 100% correction.

==============================================================
==============================================================


$VIX note Weekly, SAR just changed to Positive.

$VIX note Monthly, both SAR and Clouds positions have just turned positive, ie Volatility increase.

$SPX note Daily, Price today, 05/07/10, is at approx 61.8% of recent RUN since beginning of Feb 2010.

$SPX note Weekly, SAR just changed to Negative.
And, Weekly Price today (an end of week),05/07/10, is at approx 61.8% of recent RUNs whether you consider it starting in Feb 2010 or in Nov 2009.

$SPX note Monthly, on this chart is shown the Original Bottom in March 2009 when this Major Bull Run began, and Fibonacci percentages are shown of this Bull Runs retracement of the previous Major Bear Correction. When we reached 61.8% retracement recent correction began.

On the $SPX Monthly chart Chi2 added a Red dashed line which would be 23.6% Fibonacci retracement since reaching the 61.8% temporary top. Chi2 suggests that this would mark a possible logical maximum closing low for this correction. Another below that would be at 38.2% which is not shown.

QQQQ note Daily, Price today, 05/07/10, is at approx 61.8% of recent RUN since beginning of Feb 2010.

QQQQ note Weekly, SAR just changed to Negative.

QQQQ note Monthly, SAR just changed to Negative.
And, Monthly Price has moved below Clouds which suggests Monthly Trend is now Negative.

chichi2

05/10/10 11:18 AM

#43639 RE: chichi2 #43457

VIX SPY QQQQ daily/wkly/month (by Myself °¿°,+Chi2)

have a nice day

click on replied to msg

chichi2

05/12/10 8:26 AM

#43651 RE: chichi2 #43457

ck $VIX,$SPX,QQQQ charts (Updated)

see replied to Msg

chichi2

05/24/10 12:17 PM

#43783 RE: chichi2 #43457

Chi2= Expect Rebound of 50% to 100% of $SPX

this will bring us back to at least 1125 to 1217

click on replied to msg

chichi2

05/26/10 2:26 PM

#43812 RE: chichi2 #43457

daily $SPX and QQQQ charts

Click on replied to msg for VIX,SPX,QQQQ daily/weekly/monthly

DAILY $SPX


DAILY QQQQ

chichi2

07/05/10 3:17 PM

#44219 RE: chichi2 #43457

Chi2= "Retracement" charts are all in above Sticky post by Myself/Chi2, see $VIX $SPX,QQQQ Sticky post

click on replied to msg,
then scroll down to see $SPX charts

chichi2

07/26/10 6:35 PM

#44416 RE: chichi2 #43457

$SPX Daily chart (Closed_Above 200DMA_&_50%_retracement)

a little more Up maybe be coming, but be careful
McClellan Oscillators are into Turn Zone, and only a little more
Up is practical, before some Down in Prices in Necessary

click on replied to msg
for VIX,SPX,and QQQQ
Daily,Weekly,Monthly for each


chichi2

06/12/11 9:03 PM

#48214 RE: chichi2 #43457

Reminder= SPX "Expect Resistance at 76.4% retracement"

as shown on our Monthly chart for a long time as a Fibonacci hurdle



Note below the significance of using Wave 1 forecast.

The market has used this level, specifically at 1292, as a pivot or force pole (think StarWars) since reaching the major resistance predicted April 2010. SPX has been building a base here to help its major recovery. Many of the projection points in this table have been important considerations. Also note the importance of OBV (on balance volume) first used by Granville in early 1070s.