InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mimurray

04/18/10 6:24 PM

#12335 RE: penny me #12334

That is very true. Also, if it was off they could say that. There would no longer be any regulatory issues to contend with. In fact, they would be obligated to tell people it was off since so many people/shareholders are aware that such a huge deal is in the works.
icon url

relikwie

04/18/10 6:29 PM

#12336 RE: penny me #12334

Post Unavailable

Additional Information
icon url

lossregaining

04/18/10 6:39 PM

#12338 RE: penny me #12334

I posted this before. It could just be a play on words to keep people guessing. The first PR = ONE OF, The second PR = Hydro,and the Third PR = THE CHINA COMPANY. I want to keep believing it is the HYDROELECTRIC company........It just makes one wonder why they didn't (or couldn't) say HYDROELECTRIC COMPANY in the latest PR. I AM GOING TO WAIT AND FIND OUT! I think it is still a couple of weeks out.........GLTA
Oh yeah, someone mentioned to watch the share structure......

MARCH 8TH.......
One of the second merger candidates is a colossal Hydroelectric Utility Company who serves to 80,000 users in China, with assets over $200 million (USD) Obviously if the hydroelectric utility merger negotiations do not come to fruition, the company will reduce the authorized share structure back to the original andpreviously announced 888 million shares.

MARCH 22ND.......
This second merger company will represent a smaller share of VCTY as the merger negotiations with the China-based hydroelectric utility as the primary candidate continue

APRIL 16TH........
VCTY board and management are taking a twofold approach to the merger. One is to finalize the merger with the China company which has a staple business model and a steady revenue stream.
icon url

petergriffin

04/18/10 6:45 PM

#12339 RE: penny me #12334

Post Unavailable

Additional Information