Redman, I already commented about it on the main board but shouldn't we exclude the one time merger costs in our PE and EPS math? I mean these costs won't come in 2010 so for 2010 the numbers look even better.
2009 EPS: I dont know why everybody keeps using a different non- GAAP eps than the one used by the Company today. I know this all comes from using different FD b/c of the warrants (I was using 8.5M too for 2009)but officially, the Fully Diluted share count as of End 2009 is 6.462M shares. So the "official" non GAAP eps for any future comparative purposes should be = $4.06, not 2.94 or 3.46.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
