the president said something to the effect before that the difference in viral load drop between the 500mg BID dose and the 600mg BID dose is just noise
i agree and wouldn't make much of it. either they are at the top of the dose response, or they got 1-2 more nulls in the 600mg cohort. regardless efficacy is clearly where it needs to be
The president did make the statement that ACH-1625 produced the greatest log drop at 5 days among HCV compounds so hopefully there is some data out there that supports his assertions
i think this is posturing and wouldn't give this much weight. first of all telaprevir had comparable VL drop at 5 days, but you've got to look real hard - eyeball the graph in figure 2 at the 5 day mark from the following reference and you'll note about a 4 log drop
also the ns5a inhibitor from BMY likely has at least that much efficacy. i say this because even though the data may not be out there at 5 days, the drug had a 3 log drop after ONE dose - so i can't imagine it won't have >4 logs at 5 days..
don't get me wrong, 1625 is clearly a potent drug - but lets call a spade a spade - day 5 data is not a standard metric and some of the competing agents jsut ahven't disclosed data at day 5 specifically