Replies to post #81893 on Biocentric Energy Holdings, Inc. (BEHL)

[Rayland]

solid thoughts that I agree with ...However as stated earlier no R/S

[Dale C]

If the company is upwardly mobile with revenues, backlog, volume, rising pps a RS and lowering the AS is a good thing as long as there is a sound reason for it. On the other hand if its on its last legs the pps in a death spiral with no prospects a RS while keeping the existing AS is a trap, they are just in the business of selling shares, until the SEC pulls the plug. A RS to stop delisting procedure from the NASDAQ is a good sign that their business plan failed and the investers have left the bulding.

Dilution for the purpose of making acretive aquisitions that increase share value more than the negetive effect of dilution. NAT has done this for years increasing their fleet from 4 ships to 18 ships and have yet to tap their credit facility and they have zero debt.

[GreenGro]

Thanks for the attempted education maggco. And thanks for putting the 1,000,000,000 shares in red. Not sure how I would have seen that without the red font.

Now, here's your homework assignment. Go look at the top 50 iHub boards and come back and report the percentage of companies with an A/S over 1,000,000,000. Then perform some research on other biofuel companies and their respective A/S. Let us know what you come up with

Meanwhile, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the 1b A/S. You're an ambulance chaser

[relikwie]

There are companies holding several billions like citigroup, microsoft, etc. The amount is not important. The value speaks. If BEHL turns out to be the #1 player in biofuel or systems for cheap fuel creation that competes with the fossil fuels, I guess with one billion O/S PPS could be easily $100.

For the short term and with the goal to uplist to NASDAQ I think 1 billion could be a problem.