InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RDG013

03/25/10 3:29 PM

#61080 RE: Farmboynate #61079

I seem to recall the possibility of the CuCon being turned down due to CU content, but never recvd a clear answer from the company.
icon url

djr63

03/25/10 3:36 PM

#61082 RE: Farmboynate #61079

I think I would have remembered MILLIONS Nate. Your wishful thinking doesn't make it so.
icon url

Candy B

03/25/10 3:43 PM

#61085 RE: Farmboynate #61079

Hi Nate, I remember the statement that the company was operating on the Million or so dollars it had been paid for the CuCon../IMO/ Candy B
icon url

ValueValueValue

03/25/10 4:34 PM

#61093 RE: Farmboynate #61079

Wow Nate, you're in some battles today buddy!

To support your cause:

475 tons x $2200/ton = $1,045,000

This is $1M, not millions, and only represents what we sent to our new interim buyer at the end of 2009.

This does not include any CuCon shipped to RBS Sempra before that deal fell apart, so I am not including any speculation from that deal. But, I believe there was a little revenue generated there as well.

For as much as I don't have an audited financial statement to support this, NEITHER DO ANY OF THE DETRACTORS!!

So, I would recommend believing in the wonderful Candy B as well as your own DD and move forward.

Hope this helps Nate!
VVV