InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

balihi

03/21/10 4:11 PM

#29322 RE: chloebware #29318

There isnt going to be an if,it is a WHEN.Do you think KATX received 5 million on a hunch?Do you think Ken doesnt already have good idea what we have here,based on the past research of this entire area,and his experience,knowledge of these properties??If anyone thinks this is anything remotely close to company doing exploration,and moving forward with plans to drill,all based on some kind of quesswork and wishful thinking,then you may allowed emotions of some sort to interfer with logicical thinking.
icon url

relikwie

03/21/10 4:29 PM

#29326 RE: chloebware #29318

KAT is not your average stinking pink mining company.
icon url

palacian

03/21/10 4:31 PM

#29328 RE: chloebware #29318

so chloe, you're betting they do not prove reserves?
comparing no drill to aint drilled?
not that that is relevant.
"Man, watch these things..."
yup, watching.
easy to say what you say...
nothing to prove.
and since you do not have any skin in the game
say what you want.
pps is your game.
up you're out of here
down or level you can make a case for pps,
not the full market of katx.
keeping it real, chloe.
icon url

Penny59

03/22/10 11:46 AM

#29395 RE: chloebware #29318

Are you saying KATX is shady? That seems to be your implication. If you are, please advise why you feel this way. If you are just trashing all mining stocks, I don't think that is really fair.