InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ABIGIDIOT

03/17/10 7:17 PM

#3886 RE: bluebird50 #3885

i think your concerns are easy to de-fuse. i dont believe the EC overstepped in any manner.

here is the gist in a nutshell, and when analyzing it, consider what the judge could say/do. zilch, really.


The Committee was not involved with, and does not support, the Proposed Settlement (based on all available information). At this time, the Committee intends to object to the Proposed Settlement.




key wording: "at this time,..... intends..."

no worries, or issues in my eyes.
icon url

fixedops

03/17/10 8:38 PM

#3887 RE: bluebird50 #3885

I dont know but, I think the main reason they did this was to limit the selling of the stock... Remember pre 3/3/10 share holders only, vote on the BOD issue. imo
icon url

marayatano

03/17/10 9:13 PM

#3889 RE: bluebird50 #3885

IMO, EC cannot talk to anyone re: issues at hand, however, so long as EC informs the "general public," and not select individuals, then there is no breach or insider information has been passed since everyone has the same access

IMO