Replies to post #2423 on Rule-Based Trading Systems

[JLS]

mongo,

I think it's pretty funny that Poker would use snoot as a reference.

Check out this link and follow it back a little:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=47792832

Pokersam is in the process of puking up his long-term count and replacing it with an "alternate" count that he's had "for months":

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=47783634

Pokersam is now predicting: "I believe it will carry to new all time highs above 1576. I think wave c will be much like wave a from 666 to 1150 of this move so we should reach this new high in a year or so."

And he's moved his prediction of the next crash out several years: "When the cycle wave abc of Supercycle wave (b) ends sometime in 2011-2012 we will begin a 5 cycle wave decline in Supercycle (c). It will take us below 666 and will probably take us out past 2015."

It was only a few days ago that snoot said he was in complete agreement with Pokersam. Apparently Poker didn't consult with snoot when he came up with his new count.

So what happened to "... the only correct count out there"?

It depends on what the correct definition of correct is.