InvestorsHub Logo

ayepirate

03/08/10 12:14 PM

#79012 RE: BigBake1 #79010

9 buys of 9,999 each before dropping share price, trying to shake loose shares today with a vengence, must be news coming soon! IMO

Carnac

03/08/10 12:15 PM

#79016 RE: BigBake1 #79010

Great information BigBake, I like your take on what is going on with BEHL. Glad your Holdem tournament paid off! We are in a game of Texas Holdem here of sorts and those that holdem are going to see some rewards.

Greasy

03/08/10 12:20 PM

#79017 RE: BigBake1 #79010

Well said, and glad to have you back full time here.

khesanh

03/08/10 1:54 PM

#79044 RE: BigBake1 #79010

Great info and update, thank you.

relikwie

03/08/10 5:13 PM

#79063 RE: BigBake1 #79010

On what terms does 50% of the 6m order go to RWE? AFAIK the order has been brought in by BEHL.

I think this stock will stand or fall with BEHL able to raise funds.

tikasun

03/08/10 5:51 PM

#79066 RE: BigBake1 #79010

BB ...

A few more items from yr SHs report if you dont mind >

Expect an increase to around .07 to .10 by the end of the year as revenues begin rolling in ..

I would not expect audited financials posted until May

No RS, my take is this, it will all depend on the execution of this company over the next year. (I believe he means 2010, right?) Success in generating revenues will raise the PPS. Going to OTCBB with a penny stock will make no sense, and if we are still here at this level, I cannot realistically see a way around it.

From BEHL's last PR >
Objectives for the Next Ninety Days are >
9. Complete Form 10 filing to OTC: BB requirements

Hypothetically >

1) Upgrade to OTCBB w/ penny stock makes no sense
For what I know they only require regular filings, no $ stock which to my knowledge only starts w/ NASDAQ .

2) If BEHL tells us to expect a PPS increase of .07 to .10 by eoy than why an RS ?

3) On completion of form 10 is upgrading obligatory or a choice ?

4) Audited finans by May. I tend to think that 'Audited' should boost this PPS pretty much with assets involved and projected income even if current income figures may not be accg to expectation.

I see some contradictions here but having put the above in perspective I think that overruling RS could be quite possible/realistic.
Comments appreciated. Thx