Replies to post #78994 on Biocentric Energy Holdings, Inc. (BEHL)

[ayepirate]

792k buys, 20k sells

[Kurtzy]

BigBake1, nice post!

[inthemix]

I do appreciate your Faith and enthusiasm....

The SH meeting is not that significant to me. How many people attended? They cant even provide a link where I can watch what was going on... Its 2010, you dont need to fly thousands of miles to attend a meeting.

All I am saying is: there are people with .05+ averages. They were hurt because of those PRs which were not met. Why not PR after achieving something.(Well, its their own responsibility to invest in a pinksheet but still they were pumped with empty hopes)

DF had to step down in the end. If the SH meeting was a success, if people were expecting huge achievements the pps would have told that. Well, it isnt. So, I can say that the majority is thinking like me....

[veto]

I hear what you saying - there is hope - delays and modification of product should be espected - my dissapointment is in D.F. and his lack of awareness to what effect the inability to make good on his plethora of PR's would have on management's credibility and SP. His admission that he couldn't control his tongue is little compensation to those who now realize that they are going to have to keep money tied up here for an extended period of time just to break even.

[Leftcoaster]

BigBake, as a frequent reader, but rare poster, I appreciate your efforts to spread information on BEHL. As an engineer, I hear what you're saying as far as delays to obtain the right equipment to meet our process. The fine line is in what is acceptable, versus what is best. Many really good engineers are reluctant to let designs go to production because "we can tweak this or modify that" to eek out another 1 or 2% efficiency. But at some point, it needs to be cut loose so that the revenue can start flowing.

The question for BEHL, RWE, et al. is, at what point is the system acceptable to create revenue? Did the shareholders meeting give you a feel for the answer?