No Half, the amended license agreement is exactly what it is. It is an agreement where Abbott does not have to pay the past due 2008 minimum royalty or any future minimum royalties. They also no longer have to do anything WHATSOEVER with RECAF.
As for Dog RECAF, it was not received well by the Paulson investors. They just used it as a selling opportunity as other foolish investors purchased their shares. A website is not enough to market anything at all and only alloting 100k to marketing dooms it to failure.
The website that Dog RECAF is located on still personally belongs to Moro, not BioCurex. Why is that?
As for Inverness, I do not think they are obligated to pay any minimum royalties until the end of 2010 and with the Abbott amendment, they may not ever have to pay any minimum royalty.
They did not put the test on their large analyzers as planned. Why is that? Those were the analyzers Moro specifically mentioned in his November 2008 Agoracom video. Go view it and see for yourself.
Inverness did not pay the second installment of the up front money until Moro had transferred the technology for the ELISA format.
Now it is back to plan B,C or D with Inverness.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
