InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Ex Blockman

02/17/10 3:50 PM

#5850 RE: Plata #5849

Plata,

As others here already know, and you possibly realize the same, but you're conversations with the BLM are exactly what we heard. The responses from a certain group of other NW posters, stated the exact opposite and that's why their point of views were not believable as they were falsehoods at every level. And yes, that is exactly why Timberline chose not to continue. And their annual report does reflect the same to a degree as to a need for capital.
icon url

BerryBuck

02/17/10 3:57 PM

#5851 RE: Plata #5849

so its that big of a deal in cali. to simply roll in with a big dog D9 cat and cut in a road out in the boondocks, even if the property owners have no problem with it?
icon url

BerryBuck

02/17/10 4:43 PM

#5856 RE: Plata #5849

cali. is a dandy state. when something is approved here in the east, if you stand in front of the dozer with a sign yelling you will be in the dozers tracks if you dont get out of the road.
icon url

Long2Retire

02/17/10 4:51 PM

#5857 RE: Plata #5849

Thanks Plata,

I have to admit quite a bit of ignorance here. I appreciate your willingness to respond, and in such detail. I look forward to your posts.
icon url

EquityTrader

07/20/11 1:06 PM

#16527 RE: Plata #5849

Stellar Post...Enviro concerns, not an issue.

This is from Plata, the guy who rbtree views as the most qualified poster on SUGO stock. WELL WORTH THE READ! :)

I assume that the No longer active comment is because the permit has been put on hold since Timberline pulled out. Timberline wanted to stick around and put some holes into this system but wanted the owners to defer payments until the permits were in hand. The owners declined and Timberline walked. Once that happened the permitting was put on hold. The permits are still active in the BLM register - I just checked - but the Enviro's figure that the thing is done and gone. I would be very happy if they did not come back in the process and it may be that they will not see SUGO start up the process again. I am not sure how that will work as it is something I have not seen before. But the Enviro groups and on standing notice to all permit applications that come into the BLM. They see an application they don't like, they attack. But since this is an active permit application it may be that a new notice will not go out. The comment period is done and gone and the BLM just needs to rewrite the opinion. The person I talked to at the BLM said that they would look to the company to supply help in this rewrite so SUGO will need to hire the right specialist. So it just might happen that this slides past the Enviro watch so long as SUGO does not change the permit in any way. It calls for opening an old road and drilling 7 holes. The sad thing is this road was put in before and reclaimed. It would only be putting back what was once there. Once the road is reestablished additional permitting for holes should be much simpler.