Only when [I]all [/I]info available is studied can one make an informaed investment decision.
Well that is the problem, not ALL info is available, so why post it until you have all the info? He has posted a tiny piece and is awaiting further information from one of the sources, and much like has been said repeatedly it makes no sense to post when you needed further information. It was prematurely released without knowing the details. It matters what the violations were for. It matters if they are merely minor problems. It matters what both the inspector and the company have to say about the violations. Only then could an informed decision be made, and unfortunately much like I said on Saturday it will be well into the trading day before the West Coast shows up to work to answer these questions.
You may think big deal, that if some people make a decision now on such partial information then they are being foolish that it will correct itself. That is not the point, it should never have been an occurrence in the first place. Play with your own money, but don’t ever play with others money. This is a point that you cannot seem to grasp, that is why it becomes personal. You may try to turn it on BEHL for the problem, but in this case you don’t even know what the problem is and if it is really a problem. But the potential damage cannot be repaired with a public apology if the worse case occurs, you have cost people equity and put them into a position to make a decision with that equity that would not have normally occurred.
The point of all of this comes down to this:
An accusation is being made by shareholders that BEHL has erred without the company even having a chance to speak on their behalf, the really bad part is the shareholders don’t even know what the error is in the first place other than a generality. Do you not see the problem here??????
Last thing I will say is no one is giving him a problem with posting negative information, what we are giving him a problem with is posting incomplete information with the accusation that BEHL has failed. His first post about this subject was an emotionally charged post drawing a final conclusion that BEHL has failed. Look at where the topics start straying off to, moving HQ to a more business friendly state, PBRs being erected elsewhere, so on and so forth. The impact is right there for everyone to see, and that is why it is crucial to be responsible about what you post and its impact.
Hypocritical to get on the positive posters and their impact and how they should be responsible about their posts of “to the moon” and their effects on novice or amateur investors in stocks like BEHL, but do not hold the same standards to those who post incomplete information with a bad conclusions that result in the opposite. Perspectives of those that are not risking anything are not inline with those that have, no matter how much they try to draw a correlation with their past experience in other stocks to BEHL, it will not ever amount to being an investor in BEHL currently. Lacking the DD for one, and then of course not having the risk out there tied directly to BEHL is the other.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
