InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

GreenGro

02/15/10 9:58 AM

#76328 RE: Greasy #76323

I appreciate that you are calling Greasy. As someone pointed out earlier, the postage alone for 7k+ shareholders would make it likely that BEHL would have preferred e-mail. Then again, I didn't get an e-mail or a letter. I have a feeling that many of the typical admin type duties have become secondary at Santa Ana. Perhaps this should be expected since they're still recovering from the move to Santa Ana? Or perhaps the letters are in the mail as we speak? In either event, I'm anxious to hear the results of your call. Good luck


To all: When considering the time-frame for the PBR installation at Santa Ana, be sure to consider that the target date for it's installation as announced within a Jan PR (Jan 4th?) quoted the middle of February for completion. However, we must recall that this was the target for the 2nd Gen installation, not the 3rd Gen Installation which will now include components from RWE and Siemens. I wish Dennis would have clarified this in a subsequent press release but he didin't. In any event, I wanted to point this out to everyone. And thanks to a fellow i-hubber for pointing this out to me.
icon url

theewz

02/15/10 10:00 AM

#76331 RE: Greasy #76323

I do understand your point and I hope for everyones sake it was just a delay or an issue not in their control. I hope the talk goes well. I am guessing you already emailed that markerting email mentioned in behl gates posting?