InvestorsHub Logo

Greasy

02/15/10 9:29 AM

#76322 RE: Carnac #76321

Satisfication??? Of course I'd be satisfied if I received what was said via email. If my Broker tells me they have received nothing and other shareholders state they haven't received nothing, should I be worried? Of course. I completely understand we're still in the infancy of this company, but if DF and Co. want this shareholder's meeting to be taken seriously, they need to take it serious.

Call me overeactive with the issue; I just think it is bad business when you have "7200" shareholders that have not received any formal invite one week from the shareholder's meeting.

And I will support what Gummy has discovered with the permit. I have all info of who issued the permit, so I will be conducting some DD on my own with this matter. The permit is nothing more than maybe a timely setback on the Santa Ana PBR if it is an issue at all. As stated in PRs, SC PBR will most likely be the money generator. They have a bigger staff and seems like the logical choice to produce the end product. Santa Ana is more than likely going to be the showcase for BEHL. I have bigger concerns with this so called letter than EPA/OSHA compliance issues.