InvestorsHub Logo

P2O I'm from MO

02/11/10 8:23 AM

#293336 RE: spongeboy #293332

They probably took it down because the poster misrepresented Dicon as the patent holder.

badshah

02/11/10 8:31 AM

#293338 RE: spongeboy #293332

Fabulous comment to Ms Buhl...Spongeboy, make sure you send a copy of this to the SEC and all concerned with getting the truth out in this story...I will circulate this myself to the folks I have dealt with in the past...

Leirum

02/11/10 9:24 AM

#293347 RE: spongeboy #293332

Brilliant

jtl

02/11/10 9:48 AM

#293357 RE: spongeboy #293332

Nice job SB!

Teri Buhl is bought and paid for.

By eliminating your execellent explaination from her Web site shows another example of her intentions to weave a web of deceit.

It makes one wonder what the compensation factor is that drives a suedo journalist to compromise ethical standards.

Jandrsn21

02/11/10 10:13 AM

#293367 RE: spongeboy #293332

Nice post!

RayLiottaSr

02/11/10 10:15 AM

#293372 RE: spongeboy #293332

Great job Spongeboy. keep up the good work!

scion

02/11/10 10:17 AM

#293375 RE: spongeboy #293332

What is/are the US patent number(s)?

Dicon is Spongetech and is not a distributer, they are the manufacturer and patent holder.

nilremerlin

02/11/10 11:33 AM

#293420 RE: spongeboy #293332

Excellent post, spongeboy. Many journalists are full of themselves.
Who among us has not thought:

Teri Buhl =
Terrible

What's in a name? Go SPNG! ;-)

nilremerlin

bballcoach10

02/11/10 11:37 AM

#293425 RE: spongeboy #293332

Nice DD, great post!