InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

borntwice

02/03/10 8:29 PM

#10131 RE: mr_sano #10130

sano.. "ON engineering Prussian mention no issues as to support structure and harmonic vibrations. How exactly do we know this?" The problem with this stock is nobody knows the answers to any of these questions... What we know and hear is "we're really hoping this time..." "it really looks like..." "We had a lot of people at the booth..." Who knows maybe they had the best candy in a bowl at the show and everybody kept coming back for more... Everybody agrees the concept is revolutionary and everybody agrees it would be a game changeer... but honestly nobody has seen the images it can produce and they are not brought to the most important show in the industry... So structural support... it's all a gamble.. if its the real thing, good all the way around.. It's really a game of "He sounds like a really nice guy.." Here's to crossing your fingers!!
icon url

Chemic76spirit

02/03/10 8:46 PM

#10132 RE: mr_sano #10130

could ivert to dc, has better torque at lower revolution, bt I don't know the rpm. none the less matigs post don't take up any more space thatn any elses, and besides that if you don't like them, don't read em, simple
icon url

prussian4profit

02/04/10 11:51 AM

#10170 RE: mr_sano #10130


Your posts are questionable at best, especially when the pps is on the rise.

Again, you should do a little DD on voltage output in medical devices, universal power supply, as well as mobile medical devices that require a plug in power source.

The issues that you and your buddy bring up are primary problems that would have to have been solved in order for IMGG to get to this stage with the FDA.

This indirect bashing by bring up engineering issues is laughable at best.

Now, the issue with the images and compression, that is something that I am very interested in hearing about.

Anyone with information on this would greatly benefit the board.

-p4p