<<<Provenge was designed with manufacturing in mind. It was designed by people who watched a company they loved be swiped for a song because of an inability to solve manufacturing issues. They have spent the entire 10+ years we have covered the company creating a system to make sure that doesn't happen again. That's worth knowing, I think. >>>>
I do agree with you and didn't find the article provocative or insightful.
Dendreon has not released sales data. They released manufacturing capacity data. There is a BIG difference.
I disagree. The “capacity” data DNDN has released includes both a dollar amount and a number of patients; thus, DNDN is implicitly disseminating pricing data before the product has been approved, which is something conservative companies rarely do.
Assuming you don't believe Dendreon is lying to their shareholders like SPPI did on satraplatin's SPA, there is no basis for a charge the trial is "poorly constructed."
The Seeking Alpha blogger said the IMPACT trial was not poorly constructed. Did you miss the word not?
Provenge was designed with manufacturing in mind. It was designed by people who watched a company they loved be swiped for a song because of an inability to solve manufacturing issues. They have spent the entire 10+ years we have covered the company creating a system to make sure that doesn't happen again. That's worth knowing, I think.
Didn't the CRL issued 3 years ago address CMC deficiencies? Sure 3 years is a lot of time to get things under control but given that its a novel manufacturing process and has to handle thousands of batches (not hundreds for the clinical trials) there is bound to be a lot of scrutiny. Therefore looking at DNDN as an investment at this stage where its at a MC of 4B thats just too much risk IMO. Not tying to be a drama queen bear but just trying to point out potential risks in investing in DNDN at this stage.It will eventually get approved but when is the question.