Replies to post #19157 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Miss Scarlet]

Work to Play ~

If so, kudos to whomever is man enough to swallow that large and bitter of a pill.

On another note, that post by Chiggah on napheads was quite disturbing. It said in part . . .

>>>"At the very onset of the drug trial, drug companies will frequently drop large numbers of subjects who show what the industry classifies as "sensitivity" or "bad reaction" to a drug. In other words, test subjects who experience exactly the kind of toxic reaction the trial is supposed to be tracking are dropped from the results simply because it occurs early in the trial."<<<

That alone should wake the FDA up! That highlights not only the rampant incompetence but just how broken the current system is.

Warm regards,

[DRCAL]

They should be to help save thenselves from real and not frivilous lawsuits in the 10's of billions of dollars. I still think that the drug companies are in business to make a profit.

[Easyman51]

OT: w2p; remember when there was commotion over some "possible IBM Exec's" vehicles parked at DnaPrints Office a few years back? Me thinks we ought to contract for "Lot Attendants for Customer Service", eh? We could leave them w/ a good feel about getting their ride ready while in conference w/ The Board of Director's. :>)~

Peace/Boat Drink Buddy, Easy