Replies to post #76927 on Green Energy Enterprises Inc. (GYOG)

[doughboy2]

1. Belief that secrecy is needed at this time for further acquisitions.

2. CC in ibox.

[WillyburgD]

#2 - see the iBox
#3 - rumor that originated with folks who, to put it in a charitable light, are highly skeptical of QASP. I have no DD to suggest this is anticipated anytime soon.
#1 - good question. lots of opinions on that. personally, i think that the guarded nature of disclosure may have more to do w/ Dean & Co.'s strategy. I.e., keep the news limited while additional opportunities are explored, targeted and bagged. But that's just my opinion (and optimism). Could also just be delays in the contractual details, as often happens.

[B*A*N*K*E*R]

To answer your #1:

It is MY OPINION, that this has to do with solely the issue that arrises from originally trying to close all 4 acquisitions at the same time which is IN MY OPINION been abandoned as a need or possibility at this point, but the fact remains there was originally IN MY OPINION definitive agreements signed by all parties that had real teeth to make sure that among other things that no information about any of the four be disseminated in any form. All members or the original four wanted to make sure all parties would be acquired and no information about any of the four I.E names, price, location etc until all transactions were complete. Of course you may have guessed this is my opinion but it would be corporate suicide for Dean to disclose anything about these deals until 3-4 are funded.

IMO there are some minor glitches with the other two and it looks close to resolution based on the rumors I have heard.

IMO he should have just said this in the pr and not the less than satisfying statement he made, IMO.

To answer your #2:

No basis at this time, but this would be healthy considering where we are going IMO.

Hope this helps, and I hope I stayed on topic. :)

T.

[Manti]

I'll do the rs: It's not being discussed by qasp, just ihubbers. It's a natural progression for those involved with pinks to assume that the company's primary source of income is selling equity, so when the OS maxes out, the assumption is that either the AS will be raised or there will be a reverse split to provide more shares to sell to keep the money flowing. Those who want to spread FUD love to talk rs....

If this is a scam, then they'll need more shares. If it's not a scam, they may need more eventually anyway for growth, especially considering they've already stated they plan on growing.

[Skillen]

I will answer to the best of my opinions :-)

1. The identity of the 2 acquisitons- what do people think the hold-up is all about? I know there are strong opinions all based on impatience and I am impatient too, but really, what is the logic of why they have been kept secret for over 2 weeks?
Probably related to other 4 acquisitions which may not be closed yet

2. There was some reference to a confernce call or something on a few posts yesterday, I believe. When was that and is there any transcipt or recording?
Theres something on the IBOX about it

This talk of a reverse split is also interesting, but where did it originate?
Fantasy Land

Is it mere speculation or does someone have something definitive?
It's always speculation unless someone is posting their good DD

I would not be opposed to one, in fact I can see the logic of one in terms of moving into a higher market and out of the pinks, among other things, but my question is- Is this truly being discussed by QASP or just Ihubbers?
Well, we know Ihubbers for sure.... I can imagine splits come up in meetings with every company