InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ashkelon

01/29/10 5:07 PM

#22502 RE: Rawnoc #22499

Great, I missed that comment from him. Thanks for the repost.
icon url

seabreezing

01/30/10 11:22 AM

#22523 RE: Rawnoc #22499

I think this comment by JB is one of the most revealing and important comments he has made on FB in recent days. I agree completely why would a lab allow its name and results of its work to be reviewed by the CEO of a company they have just did a thorough and massive analysis on? They wouldn't and JB wouldn't want to release the research unless it clearly supported his previously stated and researched contention that the process works. This work will be used by every JV and private owner regarding setup, maintanence and cleanup. A sort of 'how to kit', I imagine.

JB who recently had implied he may just go forward without releasing this private information to the public is doing us all a tremendous favor here. It ,with finality, will put to rest any suggestions or questions about whether the p2O processor was confirmed as functional by an independant lab and work as has been noted long ago. Most here have never had a doubt.

Lastly, I think its pretty clear this is one of the things we can expect to be Pr'd in Feb.. My guess is it will certainly be addressed before any vacation by the John and Bride. I simply can't wait. Sea
icon url

Rawnoc

02/06/10 2:12 AM

#23970 RE: Rawnoc #22499

"We are moving as fast as we can. We have no control over the state certified lab but it is worth the wait. These scientists _really_ know their stuff and their work product is impeccable. They will allow us to release their name and details when the time is right. This is quite unique as most labs do not allow you to include them in public reports. I understand what the market needs so I am moving everything along as fast as I can and remove barriers expeditiously that come up. I am really looking forward to the launch."

Let me repeat something -- "most labs do not allow you to include them in public reports"

Take a wild freakin' guess why this lab will allow it. Is it because the report is awful or because big P20 works like a charm? I think it's because they want their named this time attached to something that they too think it's going to be massive.