InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chrisma

01/29/10 3:45 PM

#2943 RE: bliz82 #2942

Its aways good to ask questions. personally the finlization of the aquistion should go smoothly IMO because why else would the CEO purchase shares before a bad PR like that would cause if it did not.
icon url

Banker2

01/29/10 3:57 PM

#2946 RE: bliz82 #2942

I understand your questions, but honestly, if those questions are a concern to you and create enough "uncertainty", those are questions that should've been answered before you invested; not after.

Do you know how many emails one of these CEO's gets from disgruntled investors? I'm sure they probably have a "shell" email account that they get routed to, or at least a universal or automated reply message.

The TA is gagged. I don't know how many times I've heard that one. Sometimes its just the TA's policy, but I don't understand why this would be such an issue if you received an email FROM THE CEO on 1/15 stating the O/S count. Not to mention, ten days after that, they issued an 8-k detailing the new transfer agent AND the share count!

"As of January 25, 2010, the Company had 125,282,396 Common Shares outstanding with 82,366,441 of those shares being Restricted Common Shares, including Insiders and Control Persons."

I mean, geez. Transparancy? How is that not? It seems that this stock will never be good enough for you to keep investing in (if you do own shares) until you have a direct line with the CEO and weekly lunches discussing their current financial position. That's the whole point of OTC's...its the game. That's all it is. This is just legalized gambling. Just like blackjack, there's a strategy involved. If you can't stomach the game, then you really shouldn't play. And what's the number one rule before walking into a casino?? Only play with money that you can afford to lose.