InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

spec_trader

01/28/10 1:09 AM

#112552 RE: sabeon01 #112550

I agree the pps is a direct result of INIX and not any shareholders.

Difference, in my opinion is, INIX is not at all acting like most of these pinky at this time. Reducing the AS was a signal they were not going to be loading us up with 2-5 Billion more shares like soo many of these other pumps do.

It actually sounded like they are truly going in the opposite direction.
As for the product, lets hope RT is a RT hit.
Also, RT to me is the least exciting piece of the puzzle. These other divisions is what I'm really interested in. Hopefully I'm not chasing a dead end.

On a side note, sabeon01, have you tried RT yet?
icon url

wallymac

01/28/10 1:12 AM

#112553 RE: sabeon01 #112550

I agree with part of your analogy. The fact is that this isn't the real launch since the real launch will be accompied by advertising the product through a variety of mediums.

It's OK with me because it allowed them to find any glitches in the distribution process prior to the full release. Once there is a full release the advertising will not only bring people to the product but to the stock itself.

icon url

Stock_Stalker

01/28/10 7:21 AM

#112570 RE: sabeon01 #112550

Bingo... you are correct.

Numbers are what matters now.
icon url

xclr8r

01/28/10 9:55 AM

#112579 RE: sabeon01 #112550

I responded to a post by QTIP and we often do to each other, over a topic that has been discussed and proved ad nauseum on this board, i.e., placing buy orders at or under the bid serve no purpose but to put downward pressure on the pps, period. It doesn't matter what state the company is in, regardless of a LITE release of a product or FULL release. That's all I have to say about that!

I have no further desire to debate you on this topic. If someone wants to contribute to the good of this company and its stock, they should buy at the ASK and help the process, DON'T KILL IT by sitting on the bid! That's about as CLEAR as I can make it. GLTY