Replies to post #287015 on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[alien42]

The Wells notice saying all same has to/needs to. Summing things up as befits. In line with the collective sentiment of the faithful longs from day one. No matter of recommendation of a lawsuit(s) being launched. No matter of the fraudulent. No matter of personal enrichment, of ill-gotten gain, of disgorgement. Nothing criminal. No such. As befits.

then there is the truth, straight from the Wells Notice...

"On December 24, 2009, the Staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) sent a written Wells notice, which was received on December 28, 2009, to each of SpongeTech Delivery Systems, Inc. (“SpongeTech”), Michael L. Metter, SpongeTech’s Chief Executive Officer, and Steven Y. Moskowitz, SpongeTech’s Chief Financial and Chief Operating Officer. The Wells notices advised that the Commission Staff intends to recommend that the Commission bring civil injunctive actions against them alleging violations of the federal securities laws contained in Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”) and Sections 10(b), 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1, and 13b2-2 thereunder; and Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13, and 13a-14 thereunder. The recommended actions would seek, among other things, permanent injunctions and civil penalties."

[Mengo80]

Thanks Stox...after today's new product release I'm ready for some real good news. :-)