No no, in these "Interesting scenario`s" It is never Megas that has to answer to anyone. Quite interesting, what happened to "the ball is in Megas`s court?" The fluff that is placed here in sickening in my opinion.
Megas you want attention? File with the SEC. end of story! JMHO
Turn2him Why are you slandering Megas? If your repeated assertions are correct the SEC would have addressed that before they cleared us after the filing of the first 15 whatever when we began to trade. Only a private organization halted us and thats beyond their legal scope to do so. Why do you repeatedly attack and accuse Megas?
No matter how the Mario issue played out even if we take your assessment into account Mario/Pammy were charged with fraud. Megas sued them and won. Thats it! The fraud they created was covered and was exceptable as a final order by a federal judge.
Everything else you so desperately want to attach to Megas was NSS created and carried out by brokers and has nothing legally to do with anything as reported by Megas to the legal authorities. Your arguement is mute. All Megas had to cover was the fraudulent cert presented to the DTCC and for that exact amount alone and was done legally.
The fraud carried out by our brokers and the DTCC can never be related back to the time line associated with Mario and the reporting of it. They are two totally separet issues of fraud with only one trackable.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
