InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

neomfriend

01/22/10 12:00 PM

#207427 RE: lesnshawn #207422

Lesnshawn - The floodgates would open in mid-2010 - and this year was going to be the HUGE breakout year for 2d barcode mobile marketing. Iain has said it convincingly as well.

The warrants again make alot of sense. Why push them so far out in the future... if they weren't planning on holding.

The Clearinghouse HAS TO be declared soon. It's in NOBODY's best interest to wait any longer.... and it's been since Sept 30 that proposals were to be submitted.

I also agree that once the clearinghouse is officially in neustar's hands, the licensing and campaigns begin to roll fast. And we all know, as soon as licensing starts to roll, campaigns and CLICKING starts to roll, and with all of that, comes BIG TIME revenue.

This phenomena is going to be AS BIG as texting, social networking, etc... How can the world of cell phone users resist such a phenomena? They won't.

I can't imagine that the company won't try to list on Nasdaq.
Why wouldn't they? It's in YA Global's best interest, if I'm deciphering all of this correctly. Regardless if they convert at .01 or .55 ..... it's much more profitable to sell when the PPS is at $65./share a few years down the road, than to sell at .45 or .25.

I guess the quickest way to get on the Nasdaq is the RS. That is the only reason a RS is good. Reduce the float, get on the Nasdaq and allow institutional investing to begin.... which WILL bring the pps up to $50-$100 when BIG TIME Revenues are the NORM.

They can be rich, just by diluting and slamming the pps.... after the RS... or they can be massively rich by allowing a listing on Nasdaq, and letting this thing run.

I don't personally know the break down of all of their options.... and the total number of shares they are able to convert over the years.

I am curious on how much is actually possible to convert and unload into the float over a year's period.

I'm also trying to grasp how the limit of 4.99% ownership of OS comes into play when considering YA's strategy of converting and holding/selling....

icon url

Arpvrp

01/22/10 4:59 PM

#207453 RE: lesnshawn #207422

Les - $2.5 million isn't much considering that it is only (in reality) $850k more then what YA had earmarked for Neom in previous funding agreements. Remember, the 4 mil that was reduced to month to month financing (after patent reaffirmed) 1.1mil - 715k - 535k had been given since. Then Neom, sustained itself for 4 months (Scanbuy money?) - Only to be given $850,000.00 more then what was already on the table "FOR COMPLETE CONTROL OF THE VOTE" and subsequently, whatever terms best suit YA Global...

Iain, handed complete control to the devil for $850k Wow! Just when barcodes are ramping up! lol and what's even more hysterical is that YA Global profited handsomely from the reduction of funds in the first place 1. By the false sense of hope that Neom didn't need the funds (perpetuated here by many lol) and 2. With the pps tanking upon further funding scares in May-June, whereas, YA recouped way in excess of $850k by setting a new low and converting (dumping upon actual funding, etc. So, in essence control was given away for how much?

There exists only 2 motives behind the recent 8k
1. To repeat the process of humongous dilution. Otherwise, why is there a need to reduce par value 90% and leave the A/S @ 5 billion?
2. YA, knows a sale won't generate much and is seeking to convert all debt to common upon such. Which dilutes the hell out of any returns the common shareholder stands to gain. Doesn't matter how one tosses the numbers around its still a substantial loss of value to the common shareholder. Note: Your NASDAQ dreams have already been shattered, by a previous poster.

That is it! Remember the increase in A/S and decrease in par value before? Well, what ended up happening? Dilution/Loss of shareholder value.

YA Global, diluted the O/S with over 800 million shares LAST YEAR alone with the majority of those shares having been converted BELOW PAR! and somehow, we are to think they haven't structured the agreements to continue dilution? When all that they have really done with this latest 8k is to ensure they can LEGALLY... and profitably. They we're in a jam with the .01 par value issue and they fixed that problem!

BTW, your numbers are so far off its not even worth debating. eom