He is probably not allowed to post again now that he is an analyst again.
Interesting he is also the one who just put the 'sell' rating on INTC with target of $15.50. He never did think Intel had a viable monopoly that could be sustained.
tad was at Needham in 2000, when Intel was investing 27 Billion in plant and equipment and could not meet demand for 2000 criticized them for not investing enough in the future:
Quote:
"I am perplexed how a leading supplier with a dominant market share sitting on $20 billion...and marketable investments could fail to invest enough to provide adequate supply to meet what has to be viewed as very modest demand growth," LaFountain wrote.