I believe that the fact that there is a consistent ratio between the holdings and the funds themselves is intentional......and could not reasonably be a coincidence. That is all I said.
~!~ And that's the rub with the posts... there are no facts there... "and could not reasonably be a coincidence..." speculative like everyone else on this board.
Constantly stressing this pike angle as if pike is a important player just feels like more noise into the mix.
Pike is moving cash around to take the lest amount of loses. Everybody does it, why not pike...why do you think pike has so many different funds.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
