InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

pantherj

01/15/10 1:24 AM

#281745 RE: jethro50 #281743

Check the facts, jethro. the contract with the Mets was for around $1 million per year.
icon url

Stock Stallion

01/15/10 1:26 AM

#281746 RE: jethro50 #281743

where do you find they paid 300K for a particular time span? LINK?
icon url

Jim Bishop

01/15/10 1:27 AM

#281747 RE: jethro50 #281743

According to the NY Daily News, the Mets are suing SpongeTech for $400,000 in bounced checks plus $2.3 million, the rest of the advertising contract they have with the team.



icon url

puppydotcom

01/15/10 9:59 AM

#281843 RE: jethro50 #281743

I know some people will claim they sold shares to get this moeny, but most sane people know better.

why lie to the Mets?

and why bounce 400K in checks?

if there were contract issues .. real companies settle the problems by settlement or court

since spongy's settlement was lying .. it left the mets no choice but to sue

som ting wong .. in spongy land