"I for one don't want to hear anything from Dean unless it has APPROVAL attached to the PR. I believe the worse thing he did for our current situation was to give false hope on a 30 day timeline off of his personal gut feeling."
Kinlaw, I have seen this misrepresentation of Deans' remarks on the CC so many times that many longs have merely acepted it as true. Dean never said that we would be approved during the 30 day period. He never said that his gut was telling him that we would be approved during the 30 day period. What he did say was that "the best case scenario" would be for approval during RSNA". Period. That is all he said. A true statement no doubt, but certainly not a statement, or better a hope or wish, upon which to make trading decisons.
However, there were many, many statements on this board by longs saying that the FDA had 20 days to respond. Many of the posts were unequivicol, that is until the 30 days had passed. Then posters dug in for further DD and came to the board stqating that the FDA had 50 days to respond. Now some say 90. It was not Dean that created these timetables. It was Dean that invented the Dominion, remember?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
