InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

P2O I'm from MO

01/10/10 7:11 PM

#279440 RE: stoxmagic #279436

That settles it..

I'm going to take out a mortgage on the payed off house just to not miss this sudden MOASS! ;-)
icon url

sponge_digger

01/10/10 9:01 PM

#279504 RE: stoxmagic #279436

Nice post stox. An enjoyable read to a very honest looking post. Your opinion on the future of the company is appreciated and in this particular post you have made clear many things that are your opinion vs what you know.

My opinion is that the final countdown has already begun and we shall get substantial information this very month. As for the 211 finra app... I can not imagine that being held up much longer. The Company and upon its legal counsil, I would think by now, has made up thier minds regarding the wells submission.
They would also know thier level of guilt and the risk involved if they where to take that road. My gut tells me it will come down to an settlement agreement or be dismissed all together. Taking the path of least disclosure

As for Daniel Pike:

Why 160MM?

Money does not seem to be the object in his buying. He has chosen his numbers and I must believe it is for a reason. 160 represents something in my opinion (and I don't believe it is 22.1% of the company). Spongeboy has written that he feels its the remainder of the float and I'm inclined to believe he is on to something. We shall all know soon enough.

To my ears and from the mouth of Bill Young, the NS situation was 1.5B and throughout the messiness (RS announcement, lawsuits, suspension, DT resignation, Wells call etc), the covering seems like it could be about 50% of that 1.5 figure. Allthouth my numbers are rough, I would still bet 500mm still need clothing. One of the more interesting questions in your post is... do the offshore nakeds even care to cover? This is a great question and my guess is NO! The money will be too big and life is to short (no pun intended). Leaving the question.... will a moass exist? well, the definition being the "mother of all short squeezes" I'd would venture to say no. A squeeze? probably, but I do not think it would be nothing by comparison to the impact it would have had back in September.

Another question to ponder is:

If offshore nakeds turned and walked away, where would that leave the MMs who created the paper? Some one has to fry.

Good luck

SD


icon url

cowtown jay

01/10/10 11:09 PM

#279563 RE: stoxmagic #279436

Hello, stox

I was actually unaware of the elated discussion in progress at the time of my posting last night. I very seldom follow the threads. As time has progressed, I find that my attention has been refined, and focused on those who best represent the pro and con arguments. Specifically, I do my best to evaluate what you and David Patch have to say. (And lately, for comic relief, I have been enjoying what "no shares" has to say).

My background inclusive of 10 years of management experience with two of the fastest growing, most successful businesses in America (according to the annual Forbes' rankings at the time)*. That experience has proven helpful to me in evaluating your input. A lot of what I see you write is what I would expect to see, given the circumstance. And depending on the topic presented, sometimes I find your non-responsiveness equally telling. I'm convinced of your legitimacy. And aware, also, that at this juncture, not even the executives are entirely pro-active, and find themselves reacting in a compelling and challenging environment. Totally understandable to me.

Patch, on the other hand, has me at a total disadvantage, being skilled in areas in which I have no experience. On one hand, I find it easy to draw a different conclusion than he does, from the facts he presents. But then, for example, in his study, he predicted that we would see management make a move as we are now seeing, with Vanity. So I give him credit where due. However, the point of my post last night being to present a far different outcome than the one he would have us believe.

I recognize that I am biased, being Long. But the fact remains that your input is more logical, and makes more sense to me. It's really no contest for me to keep my trust in the company.

But really, stox, it's time for the company to live up to the trust we have placed in them. "The numbers are on the way.
Market level poised to explode!" Trust honored at that point.

I was unaware of that NASADQ tab you referenced. I'll look it up.

And thank you, as always.

jay

*Tecnol Medical Products, and The Mentor Corporation. Sold to Kimberly-Clark, and JNJ, rspectively.
icon url

overachiever

01/10/10 11:59 PM

#279581 RE: stoxmagic #279436

Market level poised to explode!

An end to the imploding routine. Noting how readily our interim High of $0.2851 was achieved. How readily market level came off our $0.0785 capitulation Low to back above $0.15 and on to above $0.20.

The $0.50 level will be a cakewalk. And on from there. The big money factored in. On to an NCM listing.



From 20 cents all the way down to 3 cents, you have said there would be a takeover, filings made on time, no SEC investigation, no SEC suspension, no Well's Notice, etc., etc., etc. Now you claim there will be no penalties, Fat_Boy Moskowitz will continue to run this scam, and it will trade on the Nasdaq. LOL Too funny. Don't be surprised if everyone continues to ignore your 100% wrong predictions.
icon url

abruzzese

01/11/10 9:03 AM

#279608 RE: stoxmagic #279436

My guess is many have lost a lot of money here. (a fact that should not be marginalized.)Most of the frustration shareholders have been made to endure could have been alleviated with a simple filing containing the current share structure. However; management seems to be content with its present strategy, which thus far has dramatically impacted pps. Until management speaks, this board will continue to see long and drawn out posts justifying further delays with complicated conspiracy theories. imo
icon url

hasher

01/14/10 11:35 PM

#281698 RE: stoxmagic #279436

An extremely astute investment.

Timely.

Before all hell breaks loose.

Your right on this time stox.. you were talking about the reaction thats gonna come when all the shareholders get home tonight, read about spongie's NSF (not so funny) checks and the MSG lawsuits, and run for the exits tomorrow. Plus, I have been notified that if the news to date doesn't do it, the biggie rumored to be coming tomorrow should really give the "all hell breaks loose" concept some legs
icon url

MorningLightMountain

08/18/11 8:17 PM

#336312 RE: stoxmagic #279436

FUD????
icon url

MorningLightMountain

08/18/11 8:20 PM

#336313 RE: stoxmagic #279436

"A close association with SPNG management."

really, it's that what PIKE had????