John, sorry about the "nuts" comment, but ERHC would be "nuts" to purposely without information that would be a clear violation of the SEC regulations. Any attorney advising ERHC would advise otherwise and not be part of these kinds of violations. My comment was based on ERHC "knowingly" breaking the law after being legally advised to release such information and then purposely NOT release the information even though they would told to do so. Yes, ERHC would be "nuts" to do so. Maybe I worded it incorrectly, because the culprit is ERHC not the shareholders, like you and me.
Ps: I realize many wall street executives (the nasty ones) have done such things, but the government has tried its best to curtail such behavior.
Pss: John, I would appreciate you comments on the other oil company's PRing the drilling activity. (even though you may be "nuts")lol