InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

downsideup

12/16/09 1:17 PM

#34072 RE: droy24 #34068

No reason exists for CLYW to file an 8K.

I've noted there are actions apparent that have been taken, and retracted, then seemingly reasserted with obviously wobbly hands... saying, "that's my story, and I'm stuck to it". Those actions taken by larger percentage shareholders are ones that DO seem to me to have created a unique requirement for THEM to file.

The board's position as an entering argument was already properly asserted, prior to this obviously flawed effort by Drago to stake out a new "negotiating position", and it seems the board's position, well and fully spelled out in the prior filings, has not been altered in the least by this Drago driven sideshow.

If they have not changed their position from the prior filing, it seems there isn't any news they have a need to report.

If Drago wants to douse himself in lighter fluid and then threaten to light himself on fire to distract us from what the company filings already posted DO say... I don't see that creates any particular need for the board to call the firetrucks. Even when he strikes the match. Good luck with that whole setting yourself on fire thing. Hope it works out for you.

Marshmallows, anyone ?

Other than that self imposed reporting requirement generated by Diac et al, it seems there isn't anything much new to say, here.

The companys most recent filings seem they say what needed saying. It seems the assertions they contain are making some SMALL number here VERY uncomfortable, and then, you see a bit of what I'd characterize IMO as involuntary struggling going on with them, here... as they try to condition shareholder and market perceptions of their frauds, with a weak effort trying to shift the focus to the CLYW board ?

LOL!!!

Otherwise, you don't need to file an 8K to announce events that are nothing but routine events in the business, and, along with hiring an attorney, it is simply a fact, IMO, that it is a routine event, here, when Drago et al make another stab at committing fraud and stealing the patents... when they think the timing of events they generate for that purpose will mean they can get away with it, even if only because they think the shareholders are wholly unable to resist the effort being made. A not unfamiliar pattern, eh ?

I note the utter lack of shock, here, from the shareholders who are patiently observing the most recent attempt at completing the fraud... and the utter surprise we see being expressed by Diac et al that the shareholders aren't just rolling over...

That they are here posting about it... priceless.

I think "they" still haven't begun to understand the extended implication in the evolution of the facts here that they are not in control of... but, that is their problem, not ours.

I've noted that the latest efforts are looking more than a tad desperate... with cats now being stuffed back into bags a bit too late. Their current attempt at completing the scam has them WAY out on a limb, a situation they've documented for us quite nicely by submitting fraudulent filings to the court, which show them sitting out there on a limb they have already sawed off. They are out there on that limb, looking back at the tree that they have now separated themselves from, waiting for gravity to kick in and carry the tree and the rest of the planet off, falling away under the force of gravity, from the branch they are perched on.

Looks to me like this is one of those "cartoon" moments of the sort you see shortly after the not so bright coyote runs off the edge of the cliff and just stands there, suspended in mid air, before gravity kicks in. Then, you expect to see the coyote whip out a sign to communicate something...

I can't wait to see what their 8K says, but, maybe at this late stage, they've already run out of chalk ?

Whistling noises... poof... and a cloud of dust.


icon url

Deer Slayer 9791

01/24/10 10:46 PM

#34336 RE: droy24 #34068

So you knew that the BOD were going to get a TRO prior to the public and shareholders knowing. Did you get that informaition from your wife (who is on the BOD)? That is information that you should not be privy to. Did you or your wife purchase shares based on that news? Yeah, that would be considered insider trading. Let's see how long this post last before it gets deleted. Don't worry I have already copied and pasted your message to an email just in case.

There see how easy:


Posted by: droy24 Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:17:32 AM
In reply to: sirhaggus who wrote msg# 34064 Post # of 34335

"Well we have about a month before the auction of the full patent rights for our company" That will not happen. I'm sure that the BOD has its reason why they did not make a statement yet, but like you said i trust in what they are doing and i'm sure that they will say something soon.