Replies to post #269019 on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[finta]

insert-text-here


How old would you be Stox? What would your real name be? You accuse Doug of ranting and raving since he has a large position in the stock. Its easy to throw out accusation behind your alias is it not? So what is your motivation with some of you comments that have failed to pass.....Oh yeh I know. You have 2.5 million shares. Oh so you have the same motivation as you have accused Doug Firth of.

I can totally understand any long shareholder ranting and raving when people mislead others and pretend they are in the know. Everyone wants to be a prophet! Stox first of all if you would really be in the know of private deals or any other pertinent information why would you be posting it on yahoo or Ihub? What more amazing is that people dont stop with their predictions. They come up with new ones after pulling the boy that cried wolf 10 times already. Let me tell you DF was not the only person that was upset about your post of no MOASS after ranting and raving for many weeks about the coming of the MOASS.......

At least be straight shooter! You know what if your source is wrong learn from it. You are trying to shift blame saying "your sources" yet you continue to use the same sources for information.

[xDREWx]

=) thanks!

[cowtown jay]

Hi, stox

Facts being as they are.

For the entirety of the past 6 weeks, the low has been maintained at .04, with the high being in the 5 cent range. Volume ranging from just under 3 million, up to 41.7 million.

Only one of, now, possibly three reasons for such. The market dynamics of supply and demand; the familiar MM manipulation; or the controlled buy-in.

Consider now the common ground. The phantom float, upon which you and Doug agree as to its existence.

If our one cent range has been maintained for the last 6 weeks merely by the effects of supply and demand; or, if it has been due to MM manipulation, it's quite possible that there has been no reduction in the the number of phantom shares. If the shareholders' interest is only furthered by the elimination of such shares, then a controlled buy-in should be the hoped-for explanation of this trading activity.

Might you be right about some of the things you've been saying? As we agree, a controlled buy-in fits with what we've been seeing. And we've talked about more than one reason for such. And how about what you've said in regards to management delaying PR's? We PR'd Phillips Feed Stores becoming a customer some months ago. No PR on Sears/KMart, though. And holding off on filings? Form 3's have been filed for MM&L, but not for RME.

And if the grapevine chatter is wrong about the controlled buy-in existing? My MOASS-anticipated sell orders were entered Oct 19th. I'm first, or very near it, in line for fills at the various price levels I've selected. I will gladly take the extra $450,000 I will earn if those orders are filled in a MOASS.

But whether recent trading activity aggressively attacked the phantom float, and generated tens of millions of dollars for the company's coffers; or, the MOASS is executed in full; I win either way.

thank you, stox

jay

[CYRXorbust]

"With my harboring no personal ill will toward Doug. But he need definitely to come back down to earth and to routinely conduct himself in a manner fully commensurate with his age and overall station in life."

for once i could not agree with you more