Replies to post #268679 on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[El_Jefe42]

Stox - your effort is much appreciated. However, your prognostications have yet to match what we have seen in reality ... at least not what is available for public consumption. I'm looking forward to the SPNG issues to be clear regardless of the outcome. I'm holding long, so obviously I'm betting on a + ROI, but at least if it goes down the tubes, I can stop living day to day waiting and get on with life. GLTY and here's to hoping good news comes in the near term.

[P2O I'm from MO]

realistic potential for official word regarding regaining the OTCBB quotation.

So it's only 'realistic potential'.... gotcha.

The relevant task force having served subpoenas as needed.

The only way you could know that is if you or someone close to you was served or someone inside the task force told you. So which is it?

Part of what we do know/have heard is that criminal shorts have, on more than one occasion, appealed to the inside in an attempt to 'legitimize' the criminality.

So is it fact that you know with some source to back it up or is it just more 'rumors' you have heard and are passing along?

Management having, weeks ago, filed the necessary documentation.

There is no way you could possibly know this unless you are privy to inside information - legally or otherwise, unless it is again just rumor.

Just for the record.

Of course.

;-)

[hasher]

have heard is that criminal shorts have, on more than one occasion, appealed to the inside in an attempt to 'legitimize' the criminality.

Scrambling for any straw to clutch wont make any of this become reality.

[cowtown jay]

Hi, stox

I don't know of any precedent for a controlled buy in.

There may be precedents, whether public knowledge or not. Or, this action could be precedent setting. But in looking at a one cent trading range, week after week, it is as you say. "It certainly fits."

Justice served, to the extent that those illegally short are forced to cover. No small accomplishment.

But more to the story seems likely. Avoidance of systemic risk. The national imperative necessarily being met. No more Lehman Brothers, or Bear Stearns, if it can be avoided.

Would it be fair? Far from it.

A forced covering on the open market representing the only fair solution for shareholders. But are there any among us who think that justice and fairness are always synonomous?

Regaining the OTCBB quotation, reducing the phantom float, implementing the business plan, all objectives moving forward as this issue is resolved. Those items representing the interests of the shareholders advancing, even if other interests are sacrificed.

I will hope that a MOASS is allowed. I still have all 11 offers in place in anticipation. However, I now have an additional offer at a price reflective of assumed fundamental valuation.

So good luck to us all.

And as always, stox, your efforts sincerely appreciated.

jay

[fourkids_9pets]

stox ..

very much appreciate your reply

best

--
4kids
all jmo

[Mingy]

Our coming trading week holding realistic potential for official word regarding regaining the OTCBB quotation.

Stox, when is OTCBB coming? Sunday, December 13, 2009 7:04:20 PM