InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jessme

12/01/09 2:15 PM

#45236 RE: Notuncoolish #45232

I have independently verified several things that BOT has "heard" and they have been accurate.


Why is it certain posters are able to verify something at Peregrine and others get no reply or Peregrine's reply is they cannot answer the question? Is there a secret handshake? Some sort of code?
How many would you say were accurate out of..............lets say 50 things he heard? I did a search yesterday looking for some. Not very impressive. It seems they all are pushed out a year. Year after year. How can they be accurate if they get pushed out a year? Wouldn't some sort of time frame apply to the word Accurate? I can say news coming from Peregrine and if it doesn't happen just keep pushing the date out until it does. Does that make me accurate? Haynes paper where are you? The data is already over a year old and useless by now.

icon url

MobyInvestor

12/01/09 3:50 PM

#45243 RE: Notuncoolish #45232

I have independently verified several things that BOT has "heard" and they have been accurate.

Really?

Like what he was hearing about how management was pissed-off at Rodman for mentioning the need to do an R/S?

Odd how that turned out.

It'a also amazing how BOT manages to show up when things are looking pretty bad and cheer up the room with a bunch of great sounding tidbits, real insider stuff.

None of which ever come to pass.

Best of all, you've been able to independently verify them as accurate...

And, you're accusing Jake, me and Realist of being in the same room?

Right...

Regards,

moby