Frog, point being, that even with a 40% discount versus the Jan pps, he's better off having the money at this point in time.
Agree?
And what was the amount he was paid, $40,000 or so? I just don't see this issue having any impact on dnap's pps as some here [the good DrCal] are saying. Isn't he suing to get paid in shares versus the money he was already paid? What's Dnap's exposure here?
Thanks for your input.