InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

toddao

11/20/09 1:53 PM

#86699 RE: StephanieVanbryce #86697

well now thats your opinion. you want sites that talk against what you believe? thats not hard to find.

Ron paul would be far better than what we have now. thats my opinion.
icon url

toddao

11/20/09 10:53 PM

#86758 RE: StephanieVanbryce #86697

Dr. Paul believes it's not the federal government's job to be involved, he believes tax payers should not be forced to fund and subsidize abortion, and therefore pushes to eliminate government sponsored abortion.



Such as this:

Dr. Paul: “Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce three bills relating to abortion.

“First, the Freedom of Conscience Act of 2003 (H.R. 1548) prohibits any federal official from expending any federal funds for any population control or population planning program or any family planning activity. It is immoral to force the American taxpayers to subsidize programs and practices they find morally abhorrent.

“Second, I rise to introduce the Partial-birth Abortion Funding Ban Act of 2003 (H.R. 1545). This bill prohibits federal officials from paying any federal funds to any individual or entity that performs partial-birth abortions.
The taxpayer must not be forced to fund this barbaric procedure.

“Finally, my Life-Protecting Judicial Limitation Act of 2003 (H.R. 1546) provides that the inferior courts of the United States do not have jurisdiction to hear abortion-related cases.
Congress must use the authority granted to it in Article 3, Section 1 of the Constitution. The district courts of the United States, as well as the United States Court of Federal Claims, should not have the authority to hear these types of cases.