InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

nybuild1

11/20/09 1:16 AM

#5279 RE: Nina4900 #5278

wow... thnx for that post.... i was trying to get my logic around the whole market cap situation.... you're absolutely right!!!! this isnt another imaging device.. so why would stay in just those boundaries? Revolutionary device would create a bigger piece of the pie!! thnx again!
icon url

ElHefe

11/20/09 1:35 AM

#5280 RE: Nina4900 #5278

Nice post, well articulated, thought out, comprehensive. But this company's gonna get sold, mark it down. All the talk about manufacturing is, IMO, posturing to avoid a low-ball offer once the bidding starts. Don't get me wrong, I think Dean is being truthful about the steps they are taking to produce if it becomes necessary. I just don't think it's going to be necessary. IMGG may well be worth $20 in 2-3 years but $4 in 2-3 months is going to look a whole lot better. One in the hand, no opportunity cost, etc. Bet on it. IMHO.